Judging Guidelines & Ambies Voting
AMBIES JURY AND VANGUARD JUDGES
The Ambies® are judged by our Ambies Jury. Judges are a select group of experienced and knowledgeable individuals within the podcast industry. As all judges are The Podcast Academy (TPA) members, they are typically professionals with a deep understanding of podcasting, including producers, editors, creators, and other industry experts. These judges are chosen for their expertise and their ability to evaluate podcasts with a critical and informed perspective. We carefully avoid assigning any entries to judges where there may be a conflict of interest, preserving the integrity of the judging process.
Their primary role is to identify the top submissions in each category, ensuring that only the highest quality podcasts move forward to the nomination stage. Submissions are evaluated through two rounds. The first round, judges review up to fifteen minute time-stamped clip from each submission and assess whether it should advance to the next round. In the next round, the judges are responsible for listening to all the entries in full, up to a maximum of 15 hours, and they must do so with an objective mindset, judging each entry based on its quality and adherence to the evaluation criteria.
Once the Jury have selected the nominees, the broader membership of TPA is invited to vote on the winners. This process ensures a collective decision on the winners and represents the diverse voices of our podcast community.
Vanguard Jury
Additionally, TPA has unveiled its inaugural Vanguard Jury—a collective of industry leaders and emerging voices dedicated to shaping and elevating the podcasting medium. This committee selected the 2026 Vanguard Podcaster of the Year, honoring an individual who has had a standout year in podcasting, with the winner to be announced at the ceremony.
The 2027 Vanguard Jury includes:
TBA
Standardized Evaluation Areas & Weights
At the core of our judging process are three essential evaluation areas: Engagement, Craftsmanship, and Noteworthiness. These form the foundation of our assessment across all categories, each weighted to ensure a balanced review of every podcast submission. There is additional criteria specific to each category in addition to these three outlined below.
Engagement
How engaging is the episode? Judges will consider how well the content captivates and holds the listener's attention.Craftsmanship
This area evaluates the level of skill and care that went into creating the episode. From editing to storytelling, craftsmanship is about recognizing the effort behind the scenes.Noteworthiness
Does the podcast stand out from the rest? Judges will assess whether the episode offers something unique or exceptional, setting it apart in a positive way.